Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BA7F6B3CB for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:14:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKwo6-0006d4-Ps for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:14:19 +0000 X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.148 Received: from mfilter20-d.gandi.net (mfilter20-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.148]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2949517208F; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:13:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter20-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter20-d.gandi.net (mfilter20-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SaV0BZxs5C0n; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:13:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 98.27.54.176 Received: from [192.168.10.146] (cpe-098-027-054-176.nc.res.rr.com [98.27.54.176]) (Authenticated sender: adsend@dunslane.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E225172070; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:13:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F9063EC.7070503@dunslane.net> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:13:48 -0400 From: Andrew Dunstan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: Christopher Browne , Magnus Hagander , Greg Sabino Mullane , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Bug tracker tool we need References: <2399c705fb70113f22e430733f44177f@biglumber.com> <4F9045A1.60308@dunslane.net> <21630.1334862327@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <21630.1334862327@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201204/1056 X-Sequence-Number: 206859 On 04/19/2012 03:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan writes: >> At any rate, I found that my spam went to nil by turning off >> notifications for comments on my commits and comments that mention me. > The first part of that seems like it would destroy most of the point > of having the mechanism at all? > > Yes, the notification piece is pretty much useless, because of the spammers. I use github as a convenient place to stash public repositories (e.g. buildfarm code), and PostgreSQL Experts uses it for both public and private repos, but if people want me to get their comments they need to go to the trouble of emailing me. cheers andrew