Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829DE2B2868
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:40:08 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from oproxy9.bluehost.com ([69.89.24.6])
	by makus.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <euler@timbira.com>) id 1SjBOY-00047P-SK
	for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:40:07 +0000
Received: (qmail 17864 invoked by uid 0); 25 Jun 2012 15:39:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO host159.hostmonster.com) (74.220.207.159)
	by oproxy9.bluehost.com with SMTP; 25 Jun 2012 15:39:53 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=timbira.com;
	s=default;
	h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID;
	bh=36fwKCADeawN3kHFULbmCuKLONGvy195WyWLDAC4Cws=;
	b=iZ5WmPcuvG7S9D6B8vYkvpzVN8Sfx63T477gop7DsjQ4eEfGtFf5/IXY8zKBguq+SrEtXfe6GjOBNjLMaSzJRVs2habCKa6NMcT+tkRh2EHbqW2bAwov1Tn/14r3YFxb;
Received: from [187.55.150.62] (port=61772 helo=[10.3.2.3])
	by host159.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <euler@timbira.com>)
	id 1SjBOK-0006ln-P4; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:39:53 -0600
Message-ID: <4FE88560.3090807@timbira.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:36:00 -0300
From: Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120510 Icedove/10.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
CC: Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>,
	Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
	Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
	Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	Claes Jakobsson <claes@versed.se>
Subject: Re: libpq compression
References: 
 <CABUevEzVpqS5RCLz2fFREdPFkuYkEKsrMpnfPixYWPki2=iJOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FDB954F.9010606@timbira.com> <5136.1339799120@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<5365.1339799869@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CABUevEz_V4YYc0tUhkC6KD2GddysM5Z76pcHcMYiMDd7dwMxVQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<11357.1339822502@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CABUevEy1sUTOeCjNicUggnMpT7MfgjWud8kQ=wkvJsfbCU8=WQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<19804.1339859730@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<9B10BD6E-31AA-4699-BB67-5C386B623F77@phlo.org>
	<27043.1339950593@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20120618174233.GA24681@svana.org>
	<CA+TgmoaTMxcAFMN8d_FXD1S_3keyq3a=Vwa7ka8cnVepy-jqjg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1D8B2B60-F42E-448C-9295-C07FACCF0611@phlo.org>
	<CABUevEybu+v7zcsM8qtOEFdQ95njyK=ERjVbdMAe3c7T2Ut6JA@mail.gmail.com>
	<7760EC03-5B38-4903-AD2D-95F787B1E1ED@phlo.org>
	<CACMqXCLkOpYnK1eLTb_bAqx344C9j=rchTeNXSW=E6+hdXwyPA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FE49F7C.9020300@timbira.com>
	<CA+Tgmobw1Hhm4ZoS34o4bJBmMtQrnbU17v01+gCMeGmf8e06Fw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+Tgmobw1Hhm4ZoS34o4bJBmMtQrnbU17v01+gCMeGmf8e06Fw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1651:host159.hostmonster.com:timbirac:timbira.com}
	{sentby:smtp auth 187.55.150.62 authed with euler@timbira.com}
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Archive-Number: 201206/1453
X-Sequence-Number: 210293

On 24-06-2012 23:04, Robert Haas wrote:
> So I think we really
> need someone to try this both ways and compare.  Right now it seems
> like we're mostly speculating on how well either approach would work,
> which is not as good as having some experimental results.
> 
Not a problem. That's what I'm thinking too but I would like to make sure that
others don't object to general idea. Let me give it a try in both ideas...


-- 
   Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira       http://www.timbira.com.br/
   PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento