Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BA52B286A for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:55:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from oproxy7.bluehost.com ([2605:dc00:100:2::a7] helo=oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com) by magus.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjGJL-0002ud-H0 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:55:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 16433 invoked by uid 0); 25 Jun 2012 20:54:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host159.hostmonster.com) (74.220.207.159) by oproxy7.bluehost.com with SMTP; 25 Jun 2012 20:54:47 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=timbira.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=IeY01x1zOkDAJjAJBfIr+COjKU1/vd3ZJezNi0h/SaU=; b=QjJX7ZEZCG0m6fAF3/mEX1ZLXltMm4RQ2O+tLrqllxIuO27KhfeMoszqzBmKQ6uHXhq6GAwYXqevgexFC/3MOSAcJ0BAASRyRFccbcmifuce2QQ52SUTismsx5K8o7Ie; Received: from [187.55.150.62] (port=61521 helo=[10.3.2.3]) by host159.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SjGJ5-0002nn-De; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:54:47 -0600 Message-ID: <4FE8CF2E.2060104@timbira.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:50:54 -0300 From: Euler Taveira User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120510 Icedove/10.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Jaskiewicz CC: Robert Haas , Marko Kreen , Florian Pflug , Magnus Hagander , Martijn van Oosterhout , Tom Lane , Bruce Momjian , Pgsql Hackers , Claes Jakobsson Subject: Re: libpq compression References: <4FDB954F.9010606@timbira.com> <5136.1339799120@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5365.1339799869@sss.pgh.pa.us> <11357.1339822502@sss.pgh.pa.us> <19804.1339859730@sss.pgh.pa.us> <9B10BD6E-31AA-4699-BB67-5C386B623F77@phlo.org> <27043.1339950593@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20120618174233.GA24681@svana.org> <1D8B2B60-F42E-448C-9295-C07FACCF0611@phlo.org> <7760EC03-5B38-4903-AD2D-95F787B1E1ED@phlo.org> <4FE49F7C.9020300@timbira.com> <4FE88560.3090807@timbira.com> <646CA066-6CC7-4EA0-8BCA-16AA428EF04C@pointblue.com.pl> In-Reply-To: <646CA066-6CC7-4EA0-8BCA-16AA428EF04C@pointblue.com.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1651:host159.hostmonster.com:timbirac:timbira.com} {sentby:smtp auth 187.55.150.62 authed with euler@timbira.com} X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201206/1491 X-Sequence-Number: 210331 On 25-06-2012 14:30, Greg Jaskiewicz wrote: > Wasn't this more of an issue in de-coupling compression from encryption ? > Let me give a try to take some conclusion. If we decide for an independent compression code instead of an SSL-based one, that is a possibility to be tested: SSL + SSL-based compression x SSL + our compression code. If the latter is faster then we could discuss the possibility to disable compression in our SSL code and put in documentation that it is recommended to enable compression in SSL connections. -- Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento