Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F2079D55 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 07:45:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SpGtV-0003Lu-R7 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:45:18 +0000 Received: by pbbrp8 with SMTP id rp8so3546572pbb.19 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:45:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p8hU9ZPcYBZdtUg0tBLUEudPUGmWWGs3VkAlsdU4MyU=; b=Toiivffv7/NP7LjVHMh2kuySlLuYHNWQV9NEVhF/c61TNbx0FQ/UBQcLwdnHiI4+P/ CGh+2Y5+YGMTrU+SmVC2J+sBtG4yB85sty3rE8hvvhGNp3UEJvKrblH/0apVX++pqhPF 80S1+pAKeBvb/1O+LxGKiW00s/uqVf55q5bbfeUZ5bYA1XnN34Z/a8G+rzw4+PtpsPre JhKk7l6nLs7GsqqcvuBY37yoTZvP+0iGkQU1uVuSKMruqMxCcqA+rRFqZV1FghAVxfff UCIP2lNuxkcARzA3icEt3JjwQA2wrg1noJ9hWP+bS6nKEg7ACzYzBK63+vnQFh0zsFOg scOw== Received: by 10.68.217.100 with SMTP id ox4mr4445215pbc.87.1342089899953; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.99] ([61.199.203.168]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id od6sm1685853pbb.44.2012.07.12.03.44.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FFEAAA9.4080000@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:44:57 +0900 From: Shigeru HANADA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Eisentraut CC: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib References: <4FD9D947.1020803@gmail.com> <1342040659.2712.14.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> In-Reply-To: <1342040659.2712.14.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201207/544 X-Sequence-Number: 211227 (2012/07/12 6:04), Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On tor, 2012-06-14 at 21:29 +0900, Shigeru HANADA wrote: >> I'd like to propose pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL, as a contrib module >> in core, again. > > Do you have any new proposals regarding naming, and how to deal with > postgresql_fdw_validator, and dblink? Yes, I've proposed to rename existing postgresql_fdw_validator to dblink_fdw_validator and move it into contrib/dblink so that pgsql_fdw can use the name "postgresql_fdw" and "postgresql_fdw_validator". Though this post has had no response... http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4F854F43.4030200@gmail.com Regards, -- Shigeru HANADA