Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h1bQu-0007QJ-52 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 18:38:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h1bQs-0004AD-Py for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 18:38:22 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h1bQs-00048V-GF for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 18:38:22 +0000 Received: from smtp-fw-2101.amazon.com ([72.21.196.25]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h1bQq-0001JL-8y for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 18:38:22 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1551897500; x=1583433500; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rCRYiQ+cP1wiaaDna7KOlfusTftFBvyZC8VR2cNjGpM=; b=aoH/ExmIK2CdgdHfDaCaTj4KRuacCVmN2NB/7F4reKodzy7gFyHKIRiI ij2V0xzbmfG4e1CZaWr2hK5TkaNbuBT0yBx14+8LEJ8DYzV9TLgh9ufd6 jy/Dc+Obl9VWfyRKfQ59yxvFJrXgHZuXVs141mwVyVCRAssgy55eLkOZw w=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,448,1544486400"; d="scan'208";a="720875424" Received: from iad6-co-svc-p1-lb1-vlan2.amazon.com (HELO email-inbound-relay-2c-87a10be6.us-west-2.amazon.com) ([10.124.125.2]) by smtp-border-fw-out-2101.iad2.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Mar 2019 18:38:13 +0000 Received: from EX13MTAUWA001.ant.amazon.com (pdx1-ws-svc-p6-lb9-vlan3.pdx.amazon.com [10.236.137.198]) by email-inbound-relay-2c-87a10be6.us-west-2.amazon.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x26IcBOj042360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 6 Mar 2019 18:38:11 GMT Received: from EX13D18UWA002.ant.amazon.com (10.43.160.199) by EX13MTAUWA001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.160.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 18:38:11 +0000 Received: from 186590ce269b.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.45) by EX13D18UWA002.ant.amazon.com (10.43.160.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 18:38:11 +0000 Subject: Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? To: Andrew Dunstan , David Rowley , Joe Conway CC: Peter Geoghegan , PostgreSQL Hackers References: <241b80ab-7af0-c606-7b2c-b0a5d6be696a@joeconway.com> From: Jeremy Schneider Message-ID: <4a068b09-5a6f-e975-07c9-2333fcef0a8a@amazon.com> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 10:38:10 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.43.162.45] X-ClientProxiedBy: EX13D17UWC002.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.61) To EX13D18UWA002.ant.amazon.com (10.43.160.199) Precedence: Bulk List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 3/5/19 14:14, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > This patch is tiny, seems perfectly reasonable, and has plenty of > support. I'm going to commit it shortly unless there are last minute > objections. +1 -- Jeremy Schneider Database Engineer Amazon Web Services