Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1uCkSh-001h3B-Ob
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 May 2025 19:29:48 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1uCkSg-00FtUE-Bi
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 May 2025 19:29:46 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1uCkSg-00FtU5-2J
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 May 2025 19:29:46 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1uCkSd-000drw-0l
	for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org;
	Wed, 07 May 2025 19:29:45 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 547JTdfO051364;
	Wed, 7 May 2025 15:29:39 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
        PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
        Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Subject: Re: disabled SSL log_like tests
In-reply-to: <8E3E58BF-CC99-4C45-9FB8-3BA83AA6FDC8@yesql.se>
References: <984fca80-85a8-4c6f-a5cc-bb860950b435@dunslane.net>
 <2199758.1744901785@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <1ce11d3f-624c-4003-a032-1b10cc138305@dunslane.net>
 <2814408.1745005558@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2859105.1745015195@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <1120735.1745350422@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+hUKG+fLqyweHqFSBcErueUVT0vDuSNWui-ySz3+d_APmq7dw@mail.gmail.com>
 <3058990.1746485124@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3227092.1746580691@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+hUKGJkUJAwckjBr-=B9oUdDgjSEH+3njd__OnPoPuAtze3Qg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3248136.1746592452@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <3004EFB2-8FFA-429A-AC5E-E3F40E002A94@yesql.se>
 <3320404.1746633879@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <8E3E58BF-CC99-4C45-9FB8-3BA83AA6FDC8@yesql.se>
Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
	message dated "Wed, 07 May 2025 19:53:38 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <51362.1746646179.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 15:29:39 -0400
Message-ID: <51363.1746646179@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51363.1746646179%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

I filed a report with the LibreSSL folks, and the answer was basically
"yeah, we know RSA-PSS doesn't work; there are multiple things that
need fixing" [1].  So it seems like we'd better find a way to skip
that test case when using LibreSSL.  Not sure what the most
appropriate check would look like.

			regards, tom lane

[1] https://marc.info/?l=libressl&m=174664225002441&w=2