Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V1lNc-0005t8-L1 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:48:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V1lNb-00067n-OE for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:48:27 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V1lNZ-00067e-6g for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:48:25 +0000 Received: from smtp.01.com ([199.36.142.181] helo=smtp-out-2.01.com) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V1lNT-0003Nl-SW for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:48:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEA4390128; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:48:18 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp-out-2.01.com Received: from smtp-out-2.01.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out-2.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4yc_rBR8gvji; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:48:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smtp-out-2.01.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF47390141; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:48:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF4F39013E; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:48:18 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp-out-2.01.com Received: from smtp-out-2.01.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out-2.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id q7uVNhsEbMzi; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:48:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [10.10.33.94] (unknown [67.23.204.2]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22E43390128; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:48:16 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <51EF082F.2080008@agliodbs.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:48:15 -0700 From: Josh Berkus Organization: PostgreSQL Experts Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Smith CC: PgHacker Subject: Re: [v9.4] row level security References: <51E880CF.3000902@gmail.com> <51E8A8C1.2050700@2ndQuadrant.com> <20130719030347.GV15510@tamriel.snowman.net> <51E8ADD9.5020600@2ndQuadrant.com> <51ED95BC.6070400@2ndQuadrant.com> <51EEAB03.2060605@agliodbs.com> <51EEBA84.3030201@2ndQuadrant.com> <51EECBB6.4010504@agliodbs.com> <51EF04EE.8010504@2ndQuadrant.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On 07/23/2013 03:34 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > I happen to think the review structure is one of the most important > components to PostgreSQL release quality. It used to be a single level > review with just the committers, now it's a two level structure. The > reason the Postgres code is so good isn't that the submitted development > is inherently any better than other projects. There's plenty of bogus > material submitted here. It's the high standards for review and commit > that are the key filter. The importance of the process to the result > isn't weighed as heavily as I think it should be. I think we're in violent agreement here. Now, we just need to convince everyone else on this list. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers