public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Drouvot, Bertrand <[email protected]>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Reconcile stats in find_tabstat_entry() and get rid of PgStat_BackendFunctionEntry
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 16:50:32 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Hi,
On 2/10/23 3:32 AM, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Thu, 9 Feb 2023 11:38:18 +0100, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <[email protected]> wrote in
>> Hi hackers,
>>
>> Please find attached a patch proposal for $SUBJECT.
>>
>> The idea has been raised in [1] by Andres: it would allow to simplify
>> even more the work done to
>> generate pg_stat_get_xact*() functions with Macros.
>>
>> Indeed, with the reconciliation done in find_tabstat_entry() then all
>> the pg_stat_get_xact*() functions
>> (making use of find_tabstat_entry()) now "look the same" (should they
>> take into account live subtransactions or not).
>>
>> Looking forward to your feedback,
>
> I like that direction.
>
Thanks for looking at it!
> Don't we rename PgStat_FunctionCounts to PgStat_FuncStatus, unifying
> neighboring functions?
>
Not sure, I think it's the counter part of PgStat_TableCounts for example.
> Why does find_tabstat_entry() copies the whole pending data and
> performs subxaction summarization?
It copies the pending data to not increment it's counters while doing the summarization.
The summarization was done here to avoid the pg_stat_get_xact*() functions to do the computation so that all
the pg_stat_get_xact*() functions look the same but....
> The summarization is needed only by
> few callers but now that cost is imposed to the all callers along with
> additional palloc()/pfree() calls. That doesn't seem reasonable.
>
I agree that's not the best approach.....
Let me come back with another proposal (thinking to increment reconciled
counters in pgstat_count_heap_insert(), pgstat_count_heap_delete() and
pgstat_count_heap_update()).
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
view thread (5+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Reconcile stats in find_tabstat_entry() and get rid of PgStat_BackendFunctionEntry
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox