Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpPpo-0000JH-Nb for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:03:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpPpn-0002Sy-JW for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:03:51 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpPoU-0000xT-6F for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:02:30 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpPoN-0004vb-54 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:02:29 +0000 Received: from pro.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t9N02EOF019777; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:02:14 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: David Fetter cc: Robert Haas , Thomas Munro , Jeff Janes , Alvaro Herrera , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain In-reply-to: <20151022232610.GC22539@fetter.org> References: <20150907135605.GP2912@alvherre.pgsql> <51382.1445549813@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20151022221425.GB22539@fetter.org> <53412.1445555106@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20151022232610.GC22539@fetter.org> Comments: In-reply-to David Fetter message dated "Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:26:10 -0700" Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:02:14 -0700 Message-ID: <54565.1445558534@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org David Fetter writes: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 04:05:06PM -0700, Tom Lane wrote: >> Given the license issues around GNU readline, requiring it seems like >> probably a non-starter. > I should have made this more clear. I am not an IP attorney and don't > play one on TV, but this is what I've gotten out of conversations with > IP attorneys on this subject: I'm not an IP attorney either, and the ones I've talked to seem to agree with you. (Red Hat's corporate attorneys, at least, certainly thought that when I last asked them.) But the observed facts are that some distros refuse to ship psql-linked-to-readline, and substitute libedit instead, because they got different advice from their attorneys. If we desupport libedit, the end result is going to be these distros shipping psql with no command-line-editing support at all. Our opinion, or even our lawyers' opinion, is unlikely to prevent that outcome. While libedit certainly has got its bugs and deficiencies, it's way better than nothing at all, so I think we'd better keep supporting it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers