Message-ID: <551E8F37.2060202@pgmasters.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 09:01:43 -0400
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sawada Masahiko <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
CC: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>,
 PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2)
References: <54E005CC.1060605@pgmasters.net>
 <20150217153402.GQ6717@tamriel.snowman.net> <54EB4E56.7050102@pgmasters.net>
 <54ECA551.8060306@pgmasters.net> <20150323053146.GA1919@toroid.org>
 <55104204.80008@pgmasters.net>
 <CAD21AoBBQXPBiOncyvZdtOfSzr121GyDoARc4jXo2v-JM_45EQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150323181724.GG3636@alvh.no-ip.org>
 <CAD21AoA1-UVvjt0q8wvXBRc83RRwDhBgtRTR5vXByPdKb=e6-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <55118509.8020009@pgmasters.net>
 <CAD21AoD+MFYjjTz08gZtyDNQ77kt71ckyKvo7W+QuPq4icMjQA@mail.gmail.com>
 <55122A1E.7030401@pgmasters.net>
 <CAD21AoBFs2sA31Y+zgioQYfiXc0vGEOM3GcgouNc_AH00QCCow@mail.gmail.com>
 <5512B71C.7030808@pgmasters.net> <551C2F0B.3010305@pgmasters.net>
 <CAD21AoBJQwwFm_S5TitohbHVbb-TWga4=7uOPofgaj+V6hrsmA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAD21AoBJQwwFm_S5TitohbHVbb-TWga4=7uOPofgaj+V6hrsmA@mail.gmail.com>
OpenPGP: id=2624538721DAF9D5FDF4952A9FCDF424A2739CF3
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="jIVjStJXogD27f1Vcr8A8WVvEJE4cdAkL"
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--jIVjStJXogD27f1Vcr8A8WVvEJE4cdAkL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 4/3/15 3:59 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:46 AM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrot=
e:
>> Let me know if you see any other issues.
>>
>=20
> I pulled HEAD, and then tried to compile source code after applied
> following "deparsing utility command patch" without #0001 and #0002.
> (because these two patches are already pushed)
> <http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150325175954.GL3636@alvh.no-ip.=
org>
>=20
> But I could not use new pg_audit patch due to compile error (that
> deparsing utility command patch might have).
> I think I'm missing something, but I'm not sure.
> Could you tell me which patch should I apply before compiling pg_audit?=


When Alvaro posted his last patch set he recommended applying them to
b3196e65:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150325175954.GL3636@alvh.no-ip.org=


Applying the 3/25 deparse patches onto b3196e65 (you'll see one trailing
space error) then applying pg_audit-v6.patch works fine.

--=20
- David Steele
david@pgmasters.net


--jIVjStJXogD27f1Vcr8A8WVvEJE4cdAkL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVHo84AAoJEIA2uIJQ5SFAYMgP/jZfMzodbYqt1uCcdD2gfeZ8
pgVRP14+je845YtfNM3lL6CyXQrrgZAdMwaZbCq34pG2s7pGBcOsYX7YQyoOXEQj
LDhcSluBGfZxn0DzeJTCARsQwxO5Nys+tmgK37p3mali2hrcL7nw7lNVGYpnrx2p
nsb+c70FYMpXiGqPXIvNjoxvXu8KgBS+PrD70Qdmegk+IT7ma0maTdXFrol6pwvB
xZXBWFGPlaXjYN5dSwNk5ndNtf5Ys7/hg7lsjbK2ahUTmGrHZsJW0ri4GCSWMW8Q
I/OKMEZxx34mOI1rcNfb/DlRHxzP3Kuc9HFZGg8vPwxlXN4PCtUnVzfv03N5ldUk
YApWyndg/7nYLNIg7yFx3uOgUuqsU0Z/rZDFBUECYJvWtyTKfaOAj4EtiyDVat0e
xPXYzjh9McfMZlZHUzeySFp6q/2S8iP/eK9zlU5L+Z48oKNufZhjPdJb3OdxrxFy
/1j+HrSuBZTPzIA70gPQnkFmBe7c2l7vLqk62mrEK068sSi1navVrKRfoSx8lstC
wwKZg6CJR61uO+XGFR33SZvq4S9V7Nn8fbNLNnVbPPBSdsP5Y2J81UZbPAwBYqbL
7O5+7JTsSotB2n6Xw0XbAsvH70rRbZxLVj+ySoxCuhnCUdaFVQz7Luwaejd1+iMh
GCfIaCU+OmdbYDRdtsgu
=lDSB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jIVjStJXogD27f1Vcr8A8WVvEJE4cdAkL--