Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fd1aH-0004IL-Hu for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 22:58:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fd1aF-0008Pv-KI for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 22:58:11 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fd1aF-0008Po-DS for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 22:58:11 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fd1aC-0006jg-9R for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 22:58:10 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w6AMw508005548; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:58:05 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof? In-reply-to: <20180710224421.lnuq3aavioc7na2r@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20180710224421.lnuq3aavioc7na2r@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:44:21 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5546.1531263485.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:58:05 -0400 Message-ID: <5547.1531263485@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > on initdb in v11, see > https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9cqoSKS9JVcBKGa2mdn-24YPWc9XLzFDNsmjJMUpth1w@= mail.gmail.com [confused...] I recall a thread mentioning that we might need initdb in v11, but that one doesn't seem to be it? regards, tom lane