Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>
References: <55D3093C.5010800@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <CABOikdMMgkAG_iX1B_Yq4s-L8wd5PN4f1ptmPe0+z3E58bsArA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Message-ID: <55D5A1D0.2070709@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:45:52 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABOikdMMgkAG_iX1B_Yq4s-L8wd5PN4f1ptmPe0+z3E58bsArA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

On 2015-08-20 PM 06:27, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp
>> wrote:
>>
>> PARTITION BY LIST ON (name)
>> PARTITION BY RANGE ON (year, month)
>>
>> PARTITION BY LIST ON ((lower(left(name, 2)))
>> PARTITION BY RANGE ON ((extract(year from d)), (extract(month from d)))
>>
>>
> 
> How about HASH partitioning? Are there plans to support foreign tables as
> partitions?
> 

I've not given HASH partitioning a lot of thought yet. About the latter,
it seems it should not be too difficult to incorporate into the proposed
partitioning internals.

Thanks,
Amit


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers