Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aIF4O-0000fd-N8 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:26:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aIF4M-0005fR-Ok for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:26:02 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aIF2z-00042e-N0 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:24:37 +0000 Received: from mimolette.dalibo.net ([212.85.157.144]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aIF2r-0005QV-D4 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:24:35 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.35] (aur75-1-78-192-238-147.fbxo.proxad.net [78.192.238.147]) by mimolette.dalibo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DE7D1F10935; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:24:23 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GIN pending list clean up exposure to SQL To: Jeff Janes , Jaime Casanova References: Cc: pgsql-hackers From: Julien Rouhaud X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56924D75.7060801@dalibo.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:24:21 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On 29/12/2015 00:30, Jeff Janes wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Jeff Janes wrote: >> >> I'll prepare a patch for core for the January commitfest, and see if >> it flies. If not, there is always the extension to fall back to. > > Here is an updated patch. I've added type and permission checks, > docs, and some regression tests. > I just reviewed it. Patch applies cleanly, everything works as intended, including regression tests. I think the function should be declared as strict. Also, there are some trailing whitespaces in the documentation diff. Regards. > Cheers, > > Jeff > > > > -- Julien Rouhaud http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers