Subject: Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
References: <569BF49E.6030308@lucee.org> <569C1970.7000605@lucee.org>
 <CA+TgmoY6Y_==twHUzVAk8_EP-tYy5vdfQRUXr1s3zGcqn=WapQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <6490.1453144172@sss.pgh.pa.us> <569D3BB6.7010201@lucee.org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
From: "Igal @ Lucee.org" <igal@lucee.org>
Message-ID: <569D4023.3060203@lucee.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:42:27 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <569D3BB6.7010201@lucee.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

It looks like Tom is correct.

I added the directory tree to an exclude list of Microsoft Security 
Essentials and
ran `configure` without any flags and it completed successfully this time.

Thank you both for your time and expertise,


Igal

On 1/18/2016 11:23 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
> On 1/18/2016 11:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> The relevant portion of config.log seems to be this:
>> I do not think configure pays attention to mere warnings for this 
>> type of test. The real problem here seems to be the "permission 
>> denied" errors, which to me reek of broken Windows antivirus 
>> software. (As far as I'm aware, the word "broken" is redundant in 
>> that phrase.)
> Thank you both for looking into this.  The only A/V-type software that 
> I have running is the "Microsoft Security Essentials".
>>
>>> I'm a little confused as to why -Wno-cpp fixes any of that, though.
>> Most likely, it's pure chance that a retry worked.  Or if it's 
>> repeatable,
>> maybe no-cpp changes the compiler's file access patterns enough that
>> there's no longer a false trip of the AV check.
>>
>> Short answer is that I wonder how much of the OP's multiple problems
>> are being caused by AV bugs.
> I did not make any changes other than adding the compiler flags 
> between those two runs (nor afterwards).
>
> The reason that I decided to try to add the -Wno-error flag was that I 
> searched the net for the error message, and found this
> thread from 4 years ago: 
> http://postgresql.nabble.com/Setting-Werror-in-CFLAGS-td5118384.html 
> -- which showed
> a similar error message and a play of the compiler flags.
>
> I will try to run both forms again and report whether it is repeatable.
>
> Thanks again,
>
>
> Igal
>


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers