Subject: Re: proposal: make NOTIFY list de-duplication optional
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Filip_Rembia=c5=82kowski?= <filip.rembialkowski@gmail.com>,
 Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAP_rwwn2z0gPOn8GuQ3qDVS5+HgEcG2EzEOyiJtcA=vpDEhoCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <7647.1454723392@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CADxJZo16qGNKhROpM-7hg6xgxNMarh2kBW=2suOCv+5EbPUfsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP_rww=xRoBfbAqkywCHTs3jDxF9zknh1zLkrJKxZGykRtEHQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <56B7224C.4090807@2ndquadrant.fr>
 <CAP_rwwng-PBcVuNrerH=s7yHdZWFJ1-CYvqBYJv=0493PK+cgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <56B764BA.9070800@2ndquadrant.fr>
 <CAP_rwwkva10=z82ak1eQjBOCHLq6bXMf=5MsAfi6Oowu73kpGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMsr+YEaHEaqWzdbhWTGLK6415Vz=kWVdqauMcqhjwOdiJ1X-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP_rwwkG5pkGLAXz4h9ax7Qy2oyJNyjJfw6iQyTJvdPTC0TSAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHyXU0zf-nFfpkHHw7Lme-OPJJ5j4sNs2kSCK9=YUURUB8zU5Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP_rww=aTu4MLPxXapUqBotSme1msr6m9st3iPSTd+fQoY4vNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK3UJRE3wdNj0_qB-dgb+JAj3iXFNtjSf649o3hh45QtayxS8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <19849.1455049079@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAHg_5grdTibp2qbKzitmnBvqCXAo5yvChhmicfJc_sRmsW2W6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP_rww=ezkD4a-D_tTV2of92ZuC=DnPEFwC4vu8z4uViMnbw9g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Message-ID: <56E3127B.6010309@pgmasters.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:46:19 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP_rww=ezkD4a-D_tTV2of92ZuC=DnPEFwC4vu8z4uViMnbw9g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="AfJWf8Bjf293xGMg70IQMDAebdiwCrmAv"
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--AfJWf8Bjf293xGMg70IQMDAebdiwCrmAv
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Filip_Rembia=c5=82kowski?= <filip.rembialkowski@gmail.com>,
 Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Message-ID: <56E3127B.6010309@pgmasters.net>
Subject: Re: Re: proposal: make NOTIFY list de-duplication optional
References: <CAP_rwwn2z0gPOn8GuQ3qDVS5+HgEcG2EzEOyiJtcA=vpDEhoCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoYiKedu0vUXFQHKpJ1COmT7sNJd2KOLLtXQTQc6Ztgkug@mail.gmail.com>
 <7647.1454723392@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CADxJZo16qGNKhROpM-7hg6xgxNMarh2kBW=2suOCv+5EbPUfsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP_rww=xRoBfbAqkywCHTs3jDxF9zknh1zLkrJKxZGykRtEHQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <56B7224C.4090807@2ndquadrant.fr>
 <CAP_rwwng-PBcVuNrerH=s7yHdZWFJ1-CYvqBYJv=0493PK+cgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <56B764BA.9070800@2ndquadrant.fr>
 <CAP_rwwkva10=z82ak1eQjBOCHLq6bXMf=5MsAfi6Oowu73kpGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMsr+YEaHEaqWzdbhWTGLK6415Vz=kWVdqauMcqhjwOdiJ1X-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP_rwwkG5pkGLAXz4h9ax7Qy2oyJNyjJfw6iQyTJvdPTC0TSAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHyXU0zf-nFfpkHHw7Lme-OPJJ5j4sNs2kSCK9=YUURUB8zU5Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP_rww=aTu4MLPxXapUqBotSme1msr6m9st3iPSTd+fQoY4vNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK3UJRE3wdNj0_qB-dgb+JAj3iXFNtjSf649o3hh45QtayxS8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <19849.1455049079@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAHg_5grdTibp2qbKzitmnBvqCXAo5yvChhmicfJc_sRmsW2W6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP_rww=ezkD4a-D_tTV2of92ZuC=DnPEFwC4vu8z4uViMnbw9g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP_rww=ezkD4a-D_tTV2of92ZuC=DnPEFwC4vu8z4uViMnbw9g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Hi Filip,

On 2/20/16 8:00 AM, Filip Rembia=C5=82kowski wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com
>     On 2/9/16, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us <mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>>
>     wrote:
>     > FWIW, I think it would be a good thing if the NOTIFY statement synt=
ax were
>     > not remarkably different from the syntax used in the pg_notify() fu=
nction
>     > call.  To do otherwise would certainly be confusing.  So on the who=
le
>     > I'd go with the "NOTIFY channel [ , payload [ , mode ] ]" option.
>=20
>     Filip, do you agree with Tom's proposal? Do you plan to rework the
>     patch on these lines? If you are I'll try to review it, if not I could
>     give it a shot as I'm interested in having this in 9.6.
>=20
> I see that Tom's remarks give more flexibility, and your refinement
> makes sense.

It looks like we are waiting on a new patch from you before this can be
reviewed.  Are you close to having that done?

Meanwhile, I have marked it "Waiting on Author".

--=20
-David
david@pgmasters.net


--AfJWf8Bjf293xGMg70IQMDAebdiwCrmAv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=QGFn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AfJWf8Bjf293xGMg70IQMDAebdiwCrmAv--