Subject: Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
References: <20160424035859.GB29404@momjian.us>
 <CAA4eK1Jd6Z+TD+kYgWGxUL0BNeChN=LMaXuN39nchgWxKFqmtg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160425140826.GC19860@momjian.us> <571E375C.1080907@commandprompt.com>
 <CA+Tgmob_Nv0gP_O+2o6fWz495JOvhPOzFhLerQZjrMXYTwj3DA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
 PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
Message-ID: <571E640F.8080400@commandprompt.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:38:07 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+Tgmob_Nv0gP_O+2o6fWz495JOvhPOzFhLerQZjrMXYTwj3DA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

On 04/25/2016 09:04 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> max_parallel_nodes
>
> I hope you are trolling me.

Actually I wasn't. It is usually a little more obvious when I troll, 
subtlety is not exactly my strong suit ;)

The only reason I suggested that name was because of this comment:

"I think Robert said it is per-executor node, not per session, similar 
to work_mem." (from Bruce)

If it doesn't make sense, I apologize for the noise.

Sincerely,

JD

-- 
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/
                         +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers