Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTzKU-00CuC8-ES for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 08:16:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTzKR-008yTb-W9 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 08:16:15 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTzKR-008yTT-LD for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 08:16:15 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tTzKP-0021OS-19 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 08:16:14 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 5048FpZf572150; Sat, 4 Jan 2025 03:15:51 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Thomas Munro cc: Peter Eisentraut , Robert Haas , Larry Rosenman , Pgsql hackers Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: A new look at old NFS readdir() problems? In-reply-to: <520100.1735952472@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <04cf05d053e9320012b32370e228fac4@lerctr.org> <302248.1735850933@sss.pgh.pa.us> <309402.1735854754@sss.pgh.pa.us> <319417.1735860015@sss.pgh.pa.us> <338175.1735869481@sss.pgh.pa.us> <469548.1735927963@sss.pgh.pa.us> <520100.1735952472@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Fri, 03 Jan 2025 20:01:12 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <572148.1735978551.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 03:15:51 -0500 Message-ID: <572149.1735978551@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > I wouldn't have any problem with saying that we don't support NFS > implementations that don't have stable cookies. But so far I haven't > found any supported platform except FreeBSD that fails the rmtree test > against my Synology NAS. To expand on that: I've now found that Linux, macOS, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and illumos/OpenIndiana[1] pass that test. I don't believe that Windows does NFS. That means that FreeBSD is the only one of our supported platforms that fails. I think we should simply document that NFS on FreeBSD is broken, and await somebody getting annoyed enough to fix that brokenness. regards, tom lane [1] Getting OpenIndiana to work under qemu is not a task for those easily discouraged.