Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YvBqS-0006Rr-Lj for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 21:48:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YvBqR-0000BM-4A for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 21:48:07 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YvBqP-0000BF-NE for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 21:48:05 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YvBqN-0003z4-1A for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 21:48:05 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4KLluVr005765; Wed, 20 May 2015 17:47:56 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Marko Tiikkaja , Andres Freund , hackers Subject: Re: ERROR: cannot GetMultiXactIdMembers() during recovery In-reply-to: <20150518164803.GP2523@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <54EB3283.2080305@joh.to> <20150223141300.GB30784@awork2.anarazel.de> <5555F1E2.5080104@joh.to> <20150518164803.GP2523@alvh.no-ip.org> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Mon, 18 May 2015 13:48:03 -0300" Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 17:47:56 -0400 Message-ID: <5764.1432158476@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Alvaro Herrera writes: > Marko Tiikkaja wrote: >> Any chance to get this fixed in time for 9.1.16? > I hope you had pinged some days earlier. Here's a patch, but I will > wait until this week's releases have been tagged before pushing. BTW, I meant to update this thread but forgot until now: these changes did wind up included in the final tarballs for 9.2 and before, on account of the re-wrap the next day. In the rush to re-do the wrap, I forgot that I should've added entries to the release notes for these commits :-( So the documentation doesn't mention the fix, but it's there. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers