Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sawS7-00COui-2x for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 12:04:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sawS5-00DHe1-Ev for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 12:04:37 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sawS4-00DHds-Sf for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 12:04:36 +0000 Received: from fout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.144]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sawRx-003DEV-W7 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 12:04:35 +0000 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DD9138FCC7; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 08:04:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wimap21 ([10.202.2.81]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 05 Aug 2024 08:04:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=compiler.org; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1722859468; x=1722945868; bh=7Ff6RiIh6uXD6nXVEb9iGpqKLie3K4cDnrrA00ZnoXs=; b= VeftTqdOfA+O5VIwx7awiMLwmkxXkRblypxmfVtX8yxtShNAVU1dI2PJk4ijLIXV jT4oBzTacIKCXLVXwSnf+bg8vD2cE30WzzAyg6huS4BtG+owdLx/abj6cD5Y7Qy/ QPfywwXJS3gqx0vxE9x6zRMyMkyc7vuHPkFBtC4JKr+glZdMfRSWD6dQho4HFH/p c/lvm/IkXxK07uAgIIRZD8zrEXilDp9J3a3vS7CAyvDLTXTY5irPOrkeP8qw28dm jQ3Kev35yCSUx6c7/gXUmdzGwiCT5VErKOtL0DPpD6tYo12ksm04ZM9nCO049ljG nqDZvApWqMiSaAWq+LJnQg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1722859468; x= 1722945868; bh=7Ff6RiIh6uXD6nXVEb9iGpqKLie3K4cDnrrA00ZnoXs=; b=O Z1E9jF7wmPDPxcYzJz0RFhR6VZI0XrYMPz0t3ZWsaz4Y2Oe0D81XtwDqCoAPPWlD EwQvYT9r4UvnRSNWN3Q+TbuAREfmKgZ0wJHWPSiSd6X9sweePALVId8nrZS2xAe3 SPbyMvfkDEgLPrt7kI9Bi2jap7Fuy2Le2iygCG24KJDNvyUGB0rQgwpHyRPgINZP cSRSCtBK7EbpLbpWEFrjY4jDUQpVdBdHs9Nid1bHp1OSd+W6GQfmxTsuNZgePH/b 20gb7Ib5tj3RY6kFQYpvEw8Ka3bDgxhUN/PiPJhoym5dQfXM3GhCMt1EiBZElJd6 naazLQgoZO+dknbLR4dQw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrkeeigdeglecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefoggffhffvkfgjfhfutgfgsehtqhertdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpedflfhovghl ucflrggtohgsshhonhdfuceojhhovghlsegtohhmphhilhgvrhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhepvdefleelteelveffkeeukeeljeevudevfeelffduudetveeiffdttefh gefgueevnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh epjhhovghlsegtohhmphhilhgvrhdrohhrghdpnhgspghrtghpthhtoheptd X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ic6394509:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 60C0337A0084; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 08:04:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 14:04:08 +0200 From: "Joel Jacobson" To: "Aleksander Alekseev" , pgsql-hackers Message-Id: <5859e123-2fb1-4160-8999-bc8bcf51fba0@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <73b34bf6-d2d8-4eb9-acb6-5a8cdf11674b@app.fastmail.com> Subject: Re: Is *fast* 32-bit support still important? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jul 30, 2024, at 11:06, Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > Hi Joel, > > Here are my two cents. > >> 1. Who are the current users of 32-bit PostgreSQL? > > Pretty much any embedded system that uses just a few GB of memory may > win from using a 32-bit processor (not necessarily in terms of > performance, maybe in terms of price). Think of WiFi-routers, smart > TVs, 3D printers, etc. Thanks for feedback! Do we know of any such products or users? I found an OS that runs on many 32-bit chips, FreeRTOS, that seems quite= popular. Couldn't find anything about PostgreSQL and FreeRTOS though. I've posted a question on their forum. [1]=C2=A0Let's wait and see if we= hear from any real user. I see one i386 and i686 build farm animals runs Debian. Perhaps it makes sense to try to reach out to the Debian community, and see if they know of any PostgreSQL users on 32-bit? > Generally speaking it's hard to give an exact answer due to lack of > "telemetry" in PostgreSQL. Could we add a text message that is displayed to a user, when compiling PostgreSQL on a 32-bit platform? ***** NOTICE: You are compiling PostgreSQL on a 32-bit platform. We are interested in learning about your use case. Please contact us with details about how you are using PostgreSQL on this platform. Thank you! Contact: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Report from 32-bit user ***** /Joel