Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eF5Ne-0004DW-BL for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:37:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eF5Nd-000702-RO for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:37:57 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eF5Nd-0006zq-J6 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:37:57 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eF5Nb-0002lr-6J for pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:37:56 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id vAFLbrov005975; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:37:53 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Mark Dilger cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: Updated macOS start scripts In-reply-to: References: <31338.1510763554@sss.pgh.pa.us> <6D443E39-13C2-4185-9FE4-B5CB416AB06E@gmail.com> <21689.1510772433@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Mark Dilger message dated "Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:02:16 -0800" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5973.1510781873.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:37:53 -0500 Message-ID: <5974.1510781873@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Mark Dilger writes: > I have tested this on 10.11.6. I had no trouble following the instructio= ns > in the README and everything worked as described. > As far as I can tell, this patch has not yet been submitted to any commi= tfest. > I would mark it Read for Committer. Thanks for reviewing! Since you already did review it, I think we can probably skip the CF paperwork and just push it. One thing that needs to be figured out is what to do with the old osx scripts. My inclination is to remove that subdirectory in HEAD. However, I'd like to also stick these new scripts into the supported back branches, since the problem is just as real for any back branch as it is for v11. What I propose for the back branches is to add contrib/start-scripts/macos/ alongside .../osx/, keeping the latter, but adjust its README to note that those scripts are only for pre-10.10 versions of macOS. regards, tom lane