Message-ID: <5A7BE5E2.6040306@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 14:53:38 +0900
From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join
 directly
References: <5A438A45.2000909@lab.ntt.co.jp> <5A57193A.2080003@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <CA+TgmoYef9czAA1gJeqh4v47Tv=dqOp4EfdU6bV8EYkOdCwvUw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+TgmoYef9czAA1gJeqh4v47Tv=dqOp4EfdU6bV8EYkOdCwvUw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
        Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>,
        Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
        Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Precedence: bulk

(2018/02/08 5:39), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:58 AM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>  wrote:
>> (2017/12/27 20:55), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>> Attached is an updated version of the patch.
>>
>> I revised code/comments a little bit.  PFA new version.
>
> I spent a while reading through this today.  I see a few decisions
> here or there that are debatable, in the sense that somebody else
> might have chosen to do it differently, but I don't see anything that
> actually looks wrong.  So, committed.

Thanks for committing, Robert!  Thanks for reviewing, Rushabh and Ashutosh!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita