Feedback-ID: i131946ab:Fastmail
Message-ID: <5ccec641-9c06-6083-c22e-931fa99f3e81@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 09:07:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0
Subject: Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage
Content-Language: en-US
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
 pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: 
 <CA+hUKGLryBW4fNYoXzMG9y1e0H-QOTdSiTG46xCr1DNuuPwbeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGJMcwbzRyfTocfxbPBUhERqKE42d-L22jQ+vpB7an-NjQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220804034343.unm4rdynedbigamv@awork3.anarazel.de>
 <3322724.1659586159@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+hUKGJ5ej33AJL19sQph7Z8SFZ6+aUSKxFTS6pvk2Y8J9Tcwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <295419.1659918447@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+hUKGK=N8W2uFPdJr07Rs4dgRtbzKaYvCaPQasX3S8=aTO5PQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <747620.1660002360@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+hUKG+L_3brvh=8e0BW_VfX9h7MtwgN=nFHP5o7X2oZucY9dg@mail.gmail.com>
 <488234.1660229571@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20220811171412.7sgz2mpro5fpko3t@awork3.anarazel.de>
 <21173.1660238348@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
In-Reply-To: <21173.1660238348@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5ccec641-9c06-6083-c22e-931fa99f3e81%40enterprisedb.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 11.08.22 19:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> On 2022-08-11 10:52:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> -- I won't be too surprised if we get pushback on that after 15.0 is out.
> 
>>  From what angle?
> 
> If I knew that, it'd be because we'd already received the pushback.
> I'm just suspicious that very little beta testing happens on Windows,
> and what does is probably mostly people running up-to-date Windows.
> So I think there's plenty of chance for "hey, this no longer works"
> complaints later.  Maybe we'll be able to reject it all with "sorry,
> we desupported that version of Windows", but I dunno.

What is changing in PG15 about this?  Unix-domain sockets on Windows are 
supported as of PG13.