Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pQs9P-0000wh-EV for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 15:50:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pQs9O-0003CB-Bk for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 15:50:54 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pQs9N-0003Bk-7R for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 15:50:54 +0000 Received: from wnew2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.27]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pQs9I-00013I-Ow for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 15:50:52 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C722F2B06803; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 10:50:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 11 Feb 2023 10:50:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1676130644; x= 1676137844; bh=BKKcye7KE+UYaHk3OsSqB89xpQS5FYDqia0OlAPhJZA=; b=c DJzqgoJHfymgnIP62J36/dtquAj+4+oaHuinLJ72zF431dFUWIsut42PeCA4ustj 1Pgr+NPLE1wSb3VuUsPJVaTL68buadxrTb8Tu/VpSjtiLGVvkpsRZ3R3d44To78m TM+Uha1pAeHmWy9O4/iw5ofKMVGx1Acnb7pWY7zYgK1/KARgF5A9c/PHw0g2wEzM lGdWYLYyDVghTPQy9YkqI/X+76UZIQhNKFLXLzDraJBgSVxb5/fVKJvD5mtRMVaB Ew6ZLblg2ylhQAazfXJt9wXZOBlWPsg+2SCIhq7GiFrvnvbhxCmw55ognPagyxQf tbZZl53fPDQD2OKLSGFgw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudehjedgkeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefrvght vghrucfgihhsvghnthhrrghuthcuoehpvghtvghrrdgvihhsvghnthhrrghuthesvghnth gvrhhprhhishgvuggsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetteelgfelffegvedu heekkeehieekfeduteevtdejveeuhfehhfeffeetkeekhfenucffohhmrghinhepihgvth hfrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhho mhepphgvthgvrhdrvghishgvnhhtrhgruhhtsegvnhhtvghrphhrihhsvggusgdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i131946ab:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 10:50:42 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <5ceb7394-7488-d438-0951-fcc940feb539@enterprisedb.com> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 16:50:39 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: UUID v7 Content-Language: en-US To: Andres Freund , Andrey Borodin Cc: pgsql-hackers , brad@peabody.io, wolakk@gmail.com, kydavis@cisco.com, Nikolay Samokhvalov References: <20230211011453.uq2yopunpbovcbnn@awork3.anarazel.de> From: Peter Eisentraut In-Reply-To: <20230211011453.uq2yopunpbovcbnn@awork3.anarazel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 11.02.23 02:14, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2023-02-10 15:57:50 -0800, Andrey Borodin wrote: >> As you may know there's a new version of UUID being standardized [0]. >> These new algorithms of UUID generation are very promising for >> database performance. > > I agree it's very useful to have. > > >> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-peabody-dispatch-new-uuid-format-04 > > That looks to not be the current version anymore, it's superseded by: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-uuidrev-rfc4122bis Yes, this means that the draft that an individual had uploaded has now been taken on by a working group for formal review. If there is a prototype implementation, this is a good time to provide feedback. But it's too early to ship a production version.