Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tH5NN-003E8j-TJ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:05:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tH5NK-009W8E-Tr for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:05:56 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tH5NK-009W7i-8s for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:05:55 +0000 Received: from mailfr00.databene.net ([31.170.12.19]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tH5NI-000CSK-3c for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:05:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailfr00.databene.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA395F2CB; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 19:05:49 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis at mailfr00.databene.net Received: from mailfr00.databene.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (databene-mailfr00.evolix.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id N7z6Bi_y2_XM; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 19:05:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=data-bene.io; s=2024; t=1732903547; bh=L6QT27lGRO0HQbWQ2YdAhnLA7AoFdcwzAmLgcSn40l4=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=GXmUzgUBQg2dlEMH/9el0Q45HkJJ/781GgHE8G7OZhISHhFU1WyvALzQTKRSo4jlD iRkPZ3L+dAScF/9VyJfgfeyfPFV33RUiEhZ45xvUIapydT8IGOr+xH9MSBrvRKPbxS MGvdqlfO2Ni86rJUBpm1Xl47qn05/QzhR1AYd50699Cr00EjIP3RBJe5pcRu2K+ekz 3LX+jbdlRHu68Kf4v3NsPgkY/9KEBg6YSbfY9IqwGZd7SN+8/dLxrB6+xNg13qYj1U ae9BF+AkP/HAIFtyI59K9Q9GzMFjkt0B0TGbkTEKjg1HvpSrDSKnYj9/KutkyfabLD qmBeIDN7vkWOFxR0FX2F2K0V5hmXB3pbJjcnveff0RjPO3TNyutwAoK2JZeWCsKfYR RVUgYaLHfgKnFpqnvJK8i0SxG3ot6XCED1jHrxknfmn+HruPXmmc+ZNi5cQngy033J VQvxMGn+Rps+V5k3MUYHrxkJyYBzZA5slvrrhIeQcvJgn8TW6MedPWjWFsLFLJOCqp 4JZkRcr1NpLC6R75yGJ5hmXYfsZtzWNDsSXi+poLATziSPQKwT/NhiJSwFfc/q1aeS UtF8v9Gg5ALToQYf91AqHSt3yW8kEW8k5jTe0+3cnduNUapnGjOa2ZyIRIOJQjMVPs mu2iMquISJZVL24SyEuvOE5c= Received: from [192.168.10.107] (257400053.box.freepro.com [95.178.90.96]) by mailfr00.databene.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 069FD5F29A; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 19:05:46 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------PStrje0NMO0nBexs96fci72e" Message-ID: <5d80f7ac-507b-47e9-9ef5-79f08fe137cd@Data-Bene.io> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 19:05:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Guidance Needed for Testing PostgreSQL Patch (CF-5044) To: postgresql_contributors , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" Cc: Kiran Suresh Kulkarni , Hari Prasad B References: Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric_Villemain?= Organization: Data Bene In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------PStrje0NMO0nBexs96fci72e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 29/11/2024 12:04, postgresql_contributors wrote: > Hi, > I recently installed and tested the CF-5044 patch using the query > provided on the PostgreSQL community page but could not confirm its > functionality. I followed the standard process: > > 1. Applied the patch using |git|. > 2. Rebuilt PostgreSQL from source (|./configure|, |make|, |make > install|). > 3. Tested with the suggested query after restarting PostgreSQL. > > I would appreciate your guidance on verifying patch functionality and > ensuring compliance with community testing standards. If there are > additional steps or tools I should use, please let me know. > Thank you for your support as I represent Newt Global in contributing > to the PostgreSQL community. That's welcome! Maybe you'll find this wiki of interest: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch in this page there is also a link to https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/source.html Which is a nice place to explore probably. I hope it'll help --- Cédric Villemain +33 6 20 30 22 52 https://www.Data-Bene.io PostgreSQL Support, Expertise, Training, R&D --------------PStrje0NMO0nBexs96fci72e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 29/11/2024 12:04, postgresql_contributors wrote:
Hi,
I recently installed and tested the CF-5044 patch using the query provided on the PostgreSQL community page but could not confirm its functionality. I followed the standard process:
  1. Applied the patch using  git.
  2. Rebuilt PostgreSQL from source (./configure, make, make install).
  3. Tested with the suggested query after restarting PostgreSQL.
I would appreciate your guidance on verifying patch functionality and ensuring compliance with community testing standards. If there are additional steps or tools I should use, please let me know.
Thank you for your support as I represent Newt Global in contributing to the PostgreSQL community.


That's welcome!


Maybe you'll find this wiki of interest:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch in this page there is also a link to https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/source.html
Which is a nice place to explore probably.


I hope it'll help
---
Cédric Villemain +33 6 20 30 22 52
https://www.Data-Bene.io
PostgreSQL Support, Expertise, Training, R&D
--------------PStrje0NMO0nBexs96fci72e--