Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jQ7JZ-0004f1-7R for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:36:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jQ7JY-00042e-1m for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:36:40 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jQ7JX-00042W-Qs for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:36:39 +0000 Received: from [64.147.123.19] (helo=wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jQ7JQ-0004xr-0W for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:36:38 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C88B4C4; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 06:36:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 19 Apr 2020 06:36:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=0pB/uMYEQ9pvWtrftFF8aoQZTNZgOGPV9yPU9BwZb GU=; b=TdRQUBs+qgU9g9RW9jXbtvKU5qDzvuQ5oV18kq4+PykW3iqsHow2s60k8 8BaZS0eMPmRDLA3Wk0zXEYZbFB5yAJ5QONT8SzKMZSlJDI/Z33efbSJ//OIO2gWG UkKPBcSQUfhtkz/bF8kGFVmvk4bDijCx+xmR/kNaUwhaS/Er3ydyuiRDlkQx6BVP I8LkHlsiMC3n5cVC2pRmhd+PnrTR3i6g0TNMCiRsY18kInrWsE41V9s+VQHjQmW0 /BxZVJYDb7SYvjuCxF/Xi0yw1raizBp19kLuMHThy3fW/sH7kgJUshFT1cdownJo qJUgUcBnaQQESKLGH0yb4smW/kqgQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrgedugddvlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefuvfhfhfhokffffgggjggtgfesthejredttdefheenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv rhcugfhishgvnhhtrhgruhhtuceophgvthgvrhdrvghishgvnhhtrhgruhhtsedvnhguqh hurggurhgrnhhtrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrghinhepvdhnughquhgrughrrghnthdrtgho mhenucfkphepleefrddvgedvrddvudefrddvgedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgvthgvrhdrvghishgvnhhtrhgruhhtsedv nhguqhhurggurhgrnhhtrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: from april.pezone.net (p5df2d5f1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.242.213.241]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2B84B328005A; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 06:36:18 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? To: Pierre Giraud , Tom Lane , Robert Haas References: <8691.1586798003@sss.pgh.pa.us> <30753.1586971147@sss.pgh.pa.us> <29261.1586989134@sss.pgh.pa.us> Cc: Steven Pousty , Pavel Stehule , Isaac Morland , PostgreSQL Developers From: Peter Eisentraut Organization: 2ndQuadrant Message-ID: <5d92cda0-4756-11c7-b4e3-8a9960a56ef9@2ndquadrant.com> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 12:36:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 64.147.123.19 (deferred) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 2020-04-16 08:26, Pierre Giraud wrote: > The screenshot attached uses a
tag for the descrition/example block. I like this better, but then you don't really need the table because you can just make the whole thing a definition list. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services