Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dN2Md-0007ZB-LA for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 19:29:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dN2Mc-0002RK-WC for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 19:29:31 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dN2L3-00082i-Gb for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 19:27:53 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dN2L1-0001ud-0l for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 19:27:52 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v5JJRl3g006025; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:27:47 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Stephen Frost cc: Robert Haas , Peter Eisentraut , Alvaro Herrera , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" , Piotr Stefaniak Subject: Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation In-reply-to: <20170619184105.GR1769@tamriel.snowman.net> References: <20170519173111.zp6igkcg53egdy4s@alvherre.pgsql> <29275.1497624664@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20170619184105.GR1769@tamriel.snowman.net> Comments: In-reply-to Stephen Frost message dated "Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:41:05 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6023.1497900467.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:27:47 -0400 Message-ID: <6024.1497900467@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Stephen Frost writes: > * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut >> wrote: >>> On 6/16/17 10:51, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> So I'm back to the position that we ought to stick the indent >>>> code under src/tools/ in our main repo. Is anyone really >>>> seriously against that? >>> I think it would be better to have it separate. >> +1. > +1. Given the license issues raised downthread, we have no choice in the short term. So I have a request in to create a separate repo on git.postgresql.org (whose chain do I need to pull to get that approved, btw?) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers