Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAA06333B6 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:44:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14738-02 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:44:45 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-bw0-f163.google.com (mail-bw0-f163.google.com [209.85.218.163]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B705632F51 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:44:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so8066398bwz.19 for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:44:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8MGWGtLI9u1J97XLyhc5x/5o0uxsvjNIf94pok8GWBs=; b=r7TYe5h98LidULmYGRXv3tMlfX851alP4wfcx8s4o4yhYLGl1CNcqVmzHtXYc647DQ JEr0iRv3iURN6oBaU8gOfj9JYj3akdo0IyxRDxEss6kcLR+WDJFLmPhkXQtazPdADKSJ tRp08U/FplS4wrJ5LE+vgzJeeVN6z535a6OLg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Oghgo0fdJP1tbXH/Kl0LEJ5+mwSHwO98R6LrMfAZrPdlvv8aBeRzqp59VuZSHqlwrj 8kExyQZayO+bz16z06II3jXM7gY8eeCfJ8u9SUUvDCN0h1zOvzjHsBvCajsesmHD1uGE dqXKBf9TbW6JgSPM8MImIzeUawGFLVRzLbbLQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.51.210 with SMTP id e18mr5944298bkg.69.1243885486457; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:44:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A241973.9000307@agliodbs.com> References: <19107.1243873940@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4A241973.9000307@agliodbs.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:44:46 -0400 Message-ID: <603c8f070906011244j56bce67bofdec45e6087c5803@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is? From: Robert Haas To: Josh Berkus Cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.154 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.154 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200906/58 X-Sequence-Number: 139113 On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Tom, > > Let me start this out by voting the things I think we can drop until 8.5: > > * gettext plurals patch needs some polishing > -- revert patch, save for 8.5 > > # =A0adjust information_schema precision and scale fields? > -- save for 8.5 > > # instrument the Windows shared memory reattachment problem? > -- as much as I'd like to do this, the solution could be as bad as the > problem; we'd need more testing time for new instrumentation. =A0Will hav= e to > deal with via testing patched versions. > > # tweak the ordering heuristics for parallel pg_restore? > -- beta2 version is "good enough"; further improvements should be saved f= or > 8.5. > > # change or at least redocument from_collapse_limit? > -- should be doc patch only. =A0Robert Haas should write it. > > # revisit increase of default_statistics_target? > -- No. =A0Still appears to be artifact of DBT2. =A0Can't reproduce the is= sue > using pgbench, or any other test. =A0Still investigating. > > > Other questions: > > # =A0cost_nestloop and cost_hashjoin are broken for SEMI and ANTI joins > > =A0 =A0* tgl says: I think this is mostly dealt with but it could use > performance testing. > > Mark? =A0Jignesh? =A0 Can you test this? +1 to all of these. Will send extremely short doc patch tonight. I recommend we create http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items and start bumping things that can't be completed for 8.4. Basically, my opinion is that if it's not a regression, it's too late to work on it now. We should ship the release when we're confident that the new features have had adequate testing and we've squashed all the regressions. ...Robert