Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED23D632CF5 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:56:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00456-08 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:56:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF036322EB for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:56:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1975117fxm.19 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:56:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HGhTRgRZFJkoFO7skq7naww28VYmWsSC6+o59ImFGWQ=; b=n3ZAE+HlPVA6eE8WWy+6KnGMRZrT/8+wgnUfIUT/JKOwUZwvrFzitmoiIUw5y4sRzl 4iHq3WMkXn+8/CRUwu54SxqaPEMoZpma4SGfFZIF/PsRAYFBIo8w63eK23JSmFeZz4SQ faAFv9v2G0qhvHoFHQF6WoXmRwDp2ROZvfoAo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=tcSQ86rQHmgnVjOAogWROxt67ZHh7o9ak3oDVQQvD0lenAGhlHmBUQgxyu3fRvupD8 xUx6byS3N5o2ZFVCQVqL9ARjgbQ/DNOsK+hVtQ1ly/KfxtymOt+WmoJGlnIhM0LZMg43 0ThTGqcrBiIInTTTQ9h/xhOtWUcMGr6280D2U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.144.101 with SMTP id n37mr70617hba.182.1255658175667; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:56:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <10495.1255627322@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <4AC5A14F.6050306@ak.jp.nec.com> <20091012024604.GW17756@tamriel.snowman.net> <4AD54082.9050001@ak.jp.nec.com> <10495.1255627322@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:56:15 -0400 Message-ID: <603c8f070910151856g51a97adcv19bfb26f303fea89@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363) From: Robert Haas To: Tom Lane Cc: KaiGai Kohei , Stephen Frost , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.576 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200910/928 X-Sequence-Number: 147740 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Maybe if I weren't burned out after a month of CommitFesting, I could > muster a more positive reaction, but right now I just can't summon any > enthusiasm for this. Based on this review, I am marking this patch Rejected. For what it's worth, I took a quick look at this just to see if I had any reason to disagree with your conclusions. I don't. ...Robert