Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749F9633CE3 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:17:14 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43183-02-7 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 18:17:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3F6633BB3 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:16:40 -0400 (AST) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so11902704bwz.3 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:16:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=GvHSNq1OcD4ASlUv4+J8CgzxFViT/NeGMh/kFE09YCw=; b=ku9ll0PNFQQoRr3HhbucyntoXgs6qUtuJ/AuiQ/cPqTRtrSjSCZCsNFzGhCZk4bMlA ImBSkdqh6AC8OcDVgzD9DVlynyX0H6a4zpI/etEyfgTgpr/YRW7vY2J4sKkU3TEf4mx9 bDmNkDc9XGtgKoirGC0HTkNe3yVLNuagjOUJE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ct7lBhRXno1t/eRu4hshBIZehPvqyG8kRUo1FKB7hhfVXL65rrrZo1d4VQkndNxEwu L0qAnzunlLfgZXK2UU4jjVpB3v5SK/9a8s26mSwfkuyhaBj0yNRdZC0fM7wa1hEfKcrB PAoXlDxuHvSuNnAwxxx63IAQQ8NXy1u/MMI5g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.153.27 with SMTP id i27mr749755bkw.155.1262888198274; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:16:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200912272012.32556.andres@anarazel.de> References: <200912272012.32556.andres@anarazel.de> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 13:16:37 -0500 Message-ID: <603c8f071001071016h211ff0e2x41fea95835f74fb4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Small locking bugs in hs From: Robert Haas To: Andres Freund Cc: Simon Riggs , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.589 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX=3.188 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201001/663 X-Sequence-Number: 153884 On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > While unlikely to cause issues two new LWLockAcquire calls use the wrong > locking mode. > Patch attached. Does it make sense to add this to the 2010-01 CommitFest so we don't lose track of it? ...Robert