public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Jim Jones <[email protected]>
To: Nisha Moond <[email protected]>
To: Peter Smith <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PSQL - prevent describe listing tables that are already in listed schemas
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 09:30:48 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABdArM6Ls0DRkqmpg5oDjwJhkrC9rvUQ9+y1jNmwRG+cq57cVQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHut+PvSOmRrQX+VrFYHtFipV9hM=p99FeOwYCzkuU2BOaLu7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAHut+Pturr_EY3WgVMT5+rrcKLm9HcRCk5X0WH8zvwtD2K2ixA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAHut+PvfAQQTaV4qQzivBx_LLhveA0h=ugy_MRRR+NjwndNPgg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABdArM6Ls0DRkqmpg5oDjwJhkrC9rvUQ9+y1jNmwRG+cq57cVQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Nisha

On 20/05/2026 09:09, Nisha Moond wrote:
> For the describePublications (\dRp+) case, should we add an (sversion
>> = 150000) guard around the new change, since it accesses
> pg_publication_namespace, which is only available in PG15 and above?
> Thoughts?


I considered that in my first review, but since PG14 will be EOL'd by
the time PG20 is shipped, I thought it wouldn't be necessary.

Thanks!

Best, Jim

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: PSQL - prevent describe listing tables that are already in listed schemas
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox