From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
        Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
        PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Reducing pg_ctl's reaction time
In-reply-to: 
 <CAMkU=1wrMqPggnEfszE-c3PPLmKgRK17_qr7tmxBECYEbyV-4Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMkU=1xJW8e+CTotojOMBd-yzUvD0e_JZu2xHo=MnuZ4__m7Pg@mail.gmail.com>
 <18520.1498508356@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20170626202356.qybnpn5li2ke4ioc@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <18890.1498508760@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20170626203347.6efkdwiadyt33edy@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <19812.1498510147@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20170626205853.ezhnmxpotdy3wokm@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <15166.1498512630@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20170626213414.ejcesidei2hv4h5x@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <15732.1498513083@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20170626215018.2fudv2aha5rkkg4r@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <17327.1498515236@sss.pgh.pa.us> <15323.1498589958@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAMkU=1wrMqPggnEfszE-c3PPLmKgRK17_qr7tmxBECYEbyV-4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
	message dated "Thu, 29 Jun 2017 10:19:46 -0700"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <6101.1498761549.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:39:09 -0400
Message-ID: <6102.1498761549@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> In the now-committed version of this, the 'pg_ctl start' returns
> successfully as soon as the server reaches a consistent state. Which is OK,
> except that it does the same thing when hot_standby=off.  When
> hot_standby=off, I would expect it to wait for the end of recovery before
> exiting with a success code.

Um, won't it be waiting forever with that definition?

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers