Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f3NNv-0000TG-W3 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:58:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f3NNu-0007fi-IU for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:58:06 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f3NLB-00043Y-B1 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:55:17 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f3NL7-00019l-Qb for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:55:16 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w33Et51D006103; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:55:05 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Tomas Vondra cc: Andrew Dunstan , Alvaro Herrera , Stas Kelvich , Nikhil Sontakke , Andres Freund , Simon Riggs , Craig Ringer , Peter Eisentraut , Petr Jelinek , Sokolov Yura , Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada , PostgreSQL Hackers , Robert Haas Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions In-reply-to: <52ebcc54-9952-79da-64fe-f28f539bec00@2ndquadrant.com> References: <20180403143736.z42lxviikrf4iyxc@alvherre.pgsql> <52ebcc54-9952-79da-64fe-f28f539bec00@2ndquadrant.com> Comments: In-reply-to Tomas Vondra message dated "Tue, 03 Apr 2018 16:38:55 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6101.1522767305.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:55:05 -0400 Message-ID: <6102.1522767305@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Tomas Vondra writes: > On 04/03/2018 04:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Tomas Vondra wrote: >>> Yes, that is a good point actually - we need to test that replication >>> between PG10 and PG11 works correctly, i.e. that the protocol version is >>> correctly negotiated, and features are disabled/enabled accordingly etc. >> Maybe it'd be good to have a buildfarm animal to specifically test for >> that? > Not sure a buildfarm supports running two clusters with different > versions easily? You'd need some specialized buildfarm infrastructure like --- maybe the same as --- the infrastructure for testing cross-version pg_upgrade. Andrew could speak to the details better than I. regards, tom lane