Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vTLxy-000jBa-0C for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:18:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vTLxv-00CLHq-24 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:18:55 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vTLxv-00CLHg-18 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:18:55 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vTLxt-0049Xo-2u for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:18:54 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 5BAFIm7x619009; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:18:49 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera cc: Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?= , Thomas Munro , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Solaris versus our NLS files In-reply-to: <202512101432.rkz3zbykficx@alvherre.pgsql> References: <202512101432.rkz3zbykficx@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera message dated "Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:33:50 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <619007.1765379928.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:18:48 -0500 Message-ID: <619008.1765379928@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera writes: > On 2025-Dec-10, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: >> That translation commit was on the REL_12_STABLE branch, after it was >> cut from master (after rc1, even). Looking more closely, the >> post-branch translation updates deleted it from version 12, 13, 14, and >> 15, but not 16 onwards, and the file is still there in master: Hah, yeah, I failed to notice that there's a gap in which branches have that file. But it's definitely there in master. > Oh. Well, that's clearly a process failure, and the fix will require us > deleting that file on all branches from 16 and up anyway, so I have no > issues with the plan of requiring all message catalogs to be UTF-8. Shall I just go delete those files, or is there more process that ought to be observed here? regards, tom lane