Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q7yd8-0006Tu-K8 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 13:27:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q7yd6-0006mM-I6 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 13:27:44 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q7yd6-0006mC-8d for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 13:27:44 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1q7yd4-001GES-0M for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 13:27:43 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 35ADRctK629055; Sat, 10 Jun 2023 09:27:38 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Julien Rouhaud cc: David Steele , Amit Langote , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? In-reply-to: <20230610131857.cqrsm6pwq3k47yuv@jrouhaud> References: <3953179e-9540-e5d1-a743-4bef368785b0@pgmasters.net> <462cd5de-3ade-989b-0798-7e1cab562991@pgmasters.net> <470644.1686327286@sss.pgh.pa.us> <625519.1686401807@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20230610131857.cqrsm6pwq3k47yuv@jrouhaud> Comments: In-reply-to Julien Rouhaud message dated "Sat, 10 Jun 2023 21:18:57 +0800" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <629053.1686403658.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 09:27:38 -0400 Message-ID: <629054.1686403658@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Julien Rouhaud writes: > On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 08:56:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> - rte->relkind = 0; > and also handle that field in (read|out)funcs.c Oh, right. Ugh, that means a catversion bump. It's not like we've never done that during beta, but it's kind of an annoying cost for a detail as tiny as this. regards, tom lane