Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nwSB0-0006p0-8u for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 17:30:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nwSAx-0000gA-El for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 17:30:31 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nwSAx-0000f6-5R for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 17:30:31 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nwSAs-0006XP-Cl for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 17:30:28 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 251HUMOk630587; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 13:30:22 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Robert Haas cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Dagfinn_Ilmari_Manns=C3=A5ker?= , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: plperl tests fail with latest Perl 5.36 In-reply-to: References: <564579.1654093326@sss.pgh.pa.us> <87bkvcmn9i.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org> <578876.1654098042@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas message dated "Wed, 01 Jun 2022 12:52:55 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <630585.1654104622.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 13:30:22 -0400 Message-ID: <630586.1654104622@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Robert Haas writes: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 11:40 AM Tom Lane wrote: >> Looks reasonable to me, but I'm hardly a Perl monk. Anybody have >> a different opinion? > Well, it falsifies the immediately preceding comment, but I think it's > fine otherwise. Duh, right, will fix. This seems appropriate to back-patch as far as 9.2, since AFAIK there's not currently anything that breaks plperl in the out-of-support branches. regards, tom lane