Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fpdMl-0004Z4-In for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:44:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fpdMk-0001Mn-13 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:44:22 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fpdMj-0001MQ-Mc for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:44:21 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fpdMd-0007bo-2F for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:44:20 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w7EHiBg0006325; Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:44:11 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Fabien COELHO cc: Andrew Gierth , Andrew Dunstan , Stephen Frost , PostgreSQL Developers Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results into variables In-reply-to: References: <20180407031725.GX27724@tamriel.snowman.net> <20180408000001.GD27724@tamriel.snowman.net> <527f7e3e-402f-4043-b370-2e11ca84d19e@2ndQuadrant.com> <87bma55h2l.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk> Comments: In-reply-to Fabien COELHO message dated "Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:56:29 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6323.1534268651.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:44:11 -0400 Message-ID: <6324.1534268651@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Fabien COELHO writes: > I have no doubt that some MUA around would forget to do the conversion. FWIW, one reason that I invariably use patch(1) to apply submitted patches is that it will take care of stripping any CRs that may have snuck in. So I'm not particularly fussed about the problem. I'm not excited about encouraging people to use application/octet-stream rather than text/something for submitted patches. If you use text then the patch can easily be examined in the web archives; with application/octet-stream the patch has to be downloaded, adding a lot of manual overhead. (At least, that's true with my preferred web browser, maybe it's different for other people?) regards, tom lane