Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jwOTR-0000BZ-FK for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:24:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jwOTQ-0000gn-F4 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:24:16 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jwOTQ-0000gf-8G for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:24:16 +0000 Received: from mail.thelabyrinth.net ([45.56.70.56]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jwOTJ-0001hz-VY for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:24:15 +0000 Received: from Davids-MacBook-Pro.local (c-73-39-102-148.hsd1.va.comcast.net [73.39.102.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dsteele) by mail.thelabyrinth.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D30A54682; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments To: Fujii Masao , Kyotaro Horiguchi Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org References: <6e4f9605-97f3-7eba-f989-4ae41d637d2f@oss.nttdata.com> <20200709.134743.1136524996274963021.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> <866c681c-3082-7010-cc9e-bf3b9483c991@oss.nttdata.com> <20200713.160111.1304073320526166244.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> <87269252-772e-2daf-9955-674a24e24de6@pgmasters.net> From: David Steele Message-ID: <6479e9a4-0a9d-0772-0401-2c5d0de03ea7@pgmasters.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 07:24:07 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 7/17/20 5:11 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: > > > On 2020/07/14 20:30, David Steele wrote: >> On 7/14/20 12:00 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: >>> >>> The patch was no longer applied cleanly because of recent commit. >>> So I updated the patch. Attached. >>> >>> Barring any objection, I will commit this patch. >> >> This doesn't look right: >> >> +   the most recent megabytes >> +   WAL files plus one WAL file are >> >> How about: >> >> +   megabytes of >> +   WAL files plus one WAL file are > > Thanks for the comment! Isn't it better to keep "most recent" part? > If so, what about either of the followings? > > 1. megabytes of WAL files plus >     one WAL file that were most recently generated are kept all time. > > 2. megabytes + linkend="guc-wal-segment-size"> bytes >     of WAL files that were most recently generated are kept all time. "most recent" seemed implied to me, but I see your point. How about: + the most recent megabytes of + WAL files plus one additional WAL file are Regards, -- -David david@pgmasters.net