Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lyp8G-0000fA-JC for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 05:21:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lyp8F-0000LC-HX for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 05:20:59 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lyp8F-0000L4-9w for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 05:20:59 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lyp8C-0003PH-Df for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 05:20:58 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1615KmU8653609; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 01:20:48 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Noah Misch cc: Alvaro Herrera , Michael Paquier , Jacob Champion , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" , Daniel Gustafsson , info@cspug.cz Subject: Re: Preventing abort() and exit() calls in libpq In-reply-to: <20210701045309.GB2288851@rfd.leadboat.com> References: <202107010144.ffjf7l4izv4m@alvherre.pgsql> <648217.1625111110@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20210701045309.GB2288851@rfd.leadboat.com> Comments: In-reply-to Noah Misch message dated "Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:53:09 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <653607.1625116848.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 01:20:48 -0400 Message-ID: <653608.1625116848@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Noah Misch writes: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 11:45:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> we're still left with the question of why >> Solaris' "nm" doesn't support the POSIX-required options. > In POSIX, -g and -u are mutually exclusive. Solaris ignores all but the= first > of these in a command: I've just re-read the POSIX spec for "nm", and I do not see anything there that would support that interpretation. Still, we can try it without -g and see what else breaks. regards, tom lane