Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qHl4G-000847-5x for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 13:00:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qHl4E-0004k8-0t for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 13:00:10 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qHl4D-0004jz-M4 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 13:00:09 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qHl49-002XQB-8d for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 13:00:08 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4fb7589b187so2989886e87.1 for ; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 06:00:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1688734803; x=1691326803; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=D3m/p+rF4uWvo1Ci87Ovw1HggskhLE9l7d4NlHRtwBc=; b=m0OtZ4ypkqruQzX1qKnbbIczujkic9ZiE0+kuKM6EO1KzCGmGMcS0qz5Hqr+N8qidJ ps7jbQSlw8S26Hm/bJqftR3RJGstIQrcLChjS0OznHSAuMxG8K5nGgujoudajk2nCBPJ s1h2wwHhBwlOb/HmH72K6eFqvETHnTz3V+CQIGEsFLbdbbxeTfnbeWeo/RTApkxoDa+N /Cx0BXNnYi/McvD2Q1z/GLtej5uqvlkilzjikrnDRjUGxncvEn3oTGQidHHth01mRQmS R/xecGlTSDjNGcetFF50XrNjPZJcahwgOPhS8appeQKJuDt9Kum6b8oG7NiOLgVMmbUb m3gg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1688734803; x=1691326803; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=D3m/p+rF4uWvo1Ci87Ovw1HggskhLE9l7d4NlHRtwBc=; b=dmPJjiabP0oqMptUEFAGER/5oYW9m27PjktF08qCzvcxesTv4Tbz8R2LqurQ+Bi7Uq CfGzZCwN9VR/UyzsiXE2AR0MQOq0zEd5I+ez3HBU0qhERlXpLNZ4ig1zTlGwAZ8bwC/c 7QnX2Ts0Nyj/S8tNxe+CvV6ACJeouoSF4OKL7LO9X/JXhBhKR1W1li046Qm54hLKgBai cEtGu1NvKvOCS9gdDxJug3zQ/Bz+sDxCGv0RPpAkTi07sM5nH8WE2KYliLwcJq70lyLz zs4eYOPNGe4+koPhJJ0GJXuozd3prKgZ+trGf7MZK2vo1xH7+zfINN1NSVjNBHvDSrO8 ZLdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLYt/EPEKZSwB1bj/6WNL8MrfrgEJdSbW4lB3QteblJ9QDkpgxf6 lTzueKT7+OAHyN3GgnEluTA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlGSsLbt0FB3W+ebpDRCOdiYQs0vpCLqrta5woiFmux883WZLC5P4rLxnwPH4kK19DTH1Qi+TA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:10c3:b0:4fb:89cd:9616 with SMTP id k3-20020a05651210c300b004fb89cd9616mr4479810lfg.0.1688734803363; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 06:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [1.0.0.7] ([178.155.23.108]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l4-20020ac25544000000b004fbb6dd7ad1sm669622lfk.288.2023.07.07.06.00.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Jul 2023 06:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <65377ba9-dd24-e4c8-83a3-60cba8b22bf6@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 16:00:01 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16 Content-Language: en-US From: Alexander Lakhin To: David Rowley Cc: MARK CALLAGHAN , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Andres Freund References: <3d89174a-9b11-1df1-6a7d-ea64190ad26d@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Hello David, 11.05.2023 16:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote: > Yeah, I see. It's also interesting to me, which tests perform better after > that commit. It takes several hours to run all tests, so I can't present > results quickly, but I'll try to collect this information next week. To my regret, I could not find such tests that week, so I decided to try later, after reviewing my benchmark running infrastructure. But for now, as Postgres Pro company graciously shared the benchmarking infrastructure project [1], it's possible for anyone to confirm or deny my results. (You can also see which tests were performed and how.) Having done one more round of comprehensive testing, I still couldn't find winning tests for commit 3c6fc5820 (but reassured that test s64da_tpcds.query87 loses a little (and also s64da_tpcds.query38)). So it seems to me that the tests I performed or their parameters is not representative enough for that improvement, unfortunately. [1] https://github.com/postgrespro/pg-mark Best regards, Alexander