Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbEiJ-0000he-Nd for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:12:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbEiI-0005D3-ML for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:12:26 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbEiG-0005Ct-W9 for pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:12:25 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbEiE-0007sC-JV for pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:12:24 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9TJCKwQ006558; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:12:20 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Robert Haas , Andrew Dunstan cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org Subject: Something fishy happening on frogmouth Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:12:20 -0400 Message-ID: <6557.1383073940@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org The last two buildfarm runs on frogmouth have failed in initdb, like this: creating directory d:/mingw-bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.2492/src/test/regress/./tmp_check/data ... ok creating subdirectories ... ok selecting default max_connections ... 100 selecting default shared_buffers ... 128MB selecting dynamic shared memory implementation ... windows creating configuration files ... ok creating template1 database in d:/mingw-bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.2492/src/test/regress/./tmp_check/data/base/1 ... FATAL: could not open shared memory segment "Global/PostgreSQL.851401618": Not enough space child process exited with exit code 1 It shouldn't be failing like that, considering that we just finished probing for acceptable max_connections and shared_buffers without hitting any apparent limit. I suppose it's possible that the final shm segment size is a bit larger than what was tested at the shared_buffer step, but that doesn't seem very likely to be the explanation. What seems considerably more probable is that the probe for a shared memory implementation is screwing up the system state somehow. It may not be unrelated that this machine was happy before commit d2aecae went in. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers