Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nGbVI-0005sL-Qx for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 06:58:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nGbVH-0003zf-Nv for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 06:58:31 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nGbVH-0003zT-En for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 06:58:31 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nGbVE-0008Hh-Lg for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 06:58:31 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 2166wLH3668241; Sun, 6 Feb 2022 01:58:21 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: Andrew Dunstan , Justin Pryzby , Peter Eisentraut , Daniel Gustafsson , Bruce Momjian , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pg_upgrade should truncate/remove its logs before running In-reply-to: References: <45e7680a-b617-1397-afa0-35a793aacefe@enterprisedb.com> <20220125164529.GG23027@telsasoft.com> <9f05b844-3a54-5883-9d3b-b5df12cbce88@dunslane.net> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Sun, 06 Feb 2022 13:36:07 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <668239.1644130701.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2022 01:58:21 -0500 Message-ID: <668240.1644130701@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > So, it took me some time to get back to this thread, and looked at it > for the last couple of days... The buildfarm client v14 has been > released on the 29th of January, which means that we are good to go. As already mentioned, there's been no notice to buildfarm owners ... so has Andrew actually made a release? regards, tom lane