Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jFUbc-0005wM-Gz for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 03:15:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jFUbb-0001O0-Ao for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 03:15:23 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jFUbb-0001Nt-27 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 03:15:23 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jFUbX-0001Xn-QF for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 03:15:22 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 02L3F73l006708; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:15:07 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Bruce Momjian cc: Michael Paquier , Juan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Santamar=EDa?= Flecha , Gavin Flower , Robert Haas , Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: color by default In-reply-to: <20200321025522.GD10066@momjian.us> References: <32117.1577799339@sss.pgh.pa.us> <0e03c747-a48d-912e-325d-5051b593c332@archidevsys.co.nz> <20200106053824.GO3598@paquier.xyz> <171d92f5-fc29-a207-3db9-c16c63bb2ea7@archidevsys.co.nz> <20200303053101.GH32059@paquier.xyz> <20200320021557.GC1850@momjian.us> <20200321025522.GD10066@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Fri, 20 Mar 2020 22:55:22 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6706.1584760507.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:15:07 -0400 Message-ID: <6707.1584760507@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Bruce Momjian writes: >> I can confirm there is still no mention of PG_COLORS in our >> documentation. > My mistake, PG_COLOR (not PG_COLORS) is documented properly. Yeah, but the point is precisely that pg_logging_init() also responds to PG_COLORS, which is not documented anywhere. regards, tom lane