Subject: Re: Fwd: [BUGS] pg_trgm word_similarity inconsistencies or bug
To: Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_Przemys=c5=82aw_W=c3=b3jcik?=
 <jan.przemyslaw.wojcik@gmail.com>, Postgres-Bugs
 <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>,
 "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: 
 <CY4PR17MB13207ED8310F847CF117EED0D85A0@CY4PR17MB1320.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
 <20171028082225.GA2157@arthur.localdomain>
 <CAPpHfdtz4a9dTxp-Fpem8uBdSBuOQV_i2xuFyL1tG6zM6nAkpg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+YsLFp9scUNjjfYJC=84V9o-ZB66GWPq3e_Jveqs1bNejA4qA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPpHfdsDtQJ+pYfapH7GMt9n4RLByKMzHEBWcPL99C_g+rkUKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1510059095836-0.post@n3.nabble.com>
 <CA+Tgmobksqi+Kh2=NZarEhnSUAudY=3oc+K8HjqSRvytbw7cnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPpHfduRG6pXz8RC5TLppV7cpWeNPn0_4nNzX-nT4T6bb6_Y+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPpHfdtXJp0xvi8QbcHWqnrk=XyyMux4FtbJCgZFPknPbLERVA@mail.gmail.com>
 <42a3a2a4-59b9-c932-3bdf-e346e7b2e406@sigaev.ru>
 <CAPpHfdv1oYVxCmLxyEGNH7vb3Fy2s0xHdv9R_NUy5EHecUqijQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPpHfdsfdC5L0xQ2QwshevbGnoL+L6Ex5B2eJq7FhSzFUqWg2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <708593ed-1104-a0d2-56b7-097adfdcfc16@pgmasters.net>
 <CAPpHfdvP+x54XuvTUoz85iSVHFW7dwLyEjya0SOMVz5tv-2dFQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Message-ID: <67add669-c41f-c115-5c1a-34a930da5a14@pgmasters.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 19:12:25 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPpHfdvP+x54XuvTUoz85iSVHFW7dwLyEjya0SOMVz5tv-2dFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Alexander,

On 3/1/18 4:26 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 11:05 PM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net 
> <mailto:david@pgmasters.net>> wrote:
> 
>     I agree with Teodor (upthread, not quoted here) that the documentation
>     could use some editing.
> 
>     I started to do it myself, but quickly realized I have no knowledge of
>     the content.  I'm afraid I would destroy the meaning while updating the
>     grammar.
> 
> That's to problem.  If you're willing to help you can edit the documentation
> and let me review that it's correct.  Also feel free to ask any 
> questions and
> more explanation from me.  Ultimately, we need to have a documentation
> that any average user can understand, not to mention you :)

OK, I'm the CFM so I have my plate full for the next few days but if 
nobody picks this up then I will give it a go.

>     Anyone understand the subject matter well enough to review the
>     documentation?
> 
> I expect it would be hard to find anybody matching this criteria.

You are probably right, but it never hurts to try.

-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net