Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uMA8f-004AXH-Au for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2025 18:44:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uMA8d-00CJpR-VF for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2025 18:43:59 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uMA8d-00CJk3-LF for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2025 18:43:59 +0000 Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net ([199.89.3.6]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uMA8a-0004se-32 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2025 18:43:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bB2mr2BMhzlgqxt; Mon, 2 Jun 2025 18:43:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=mr01; t= 1748889835; x=1751481836; bh=xnn//JXqsuWW3O2dj6x9SH7rRMX/7cEF3JP Xx28GM8I=; b=O1VG/dgfC/RIoR/oCwvfCsw1UFMggIefZP/nwJXy4SI48PBMCkP OF9rNWMEYv6a4TkcbSZsnb3RZysHyIf5v4oMP3YY6z1Gb/EZJF0LVUs4TJQYr/BR ef/sn/2hZ6V77pmkGDrAjbC+vfDV5Zgwd1mfI/a25Yv8X3Cfh9NWLOLpOPIcilXZ sfZVnET7n6m0Rsmnt7jpvMBVKjGomTjcXLFMkwH4kaUVKsrhNCtCznzJxnDQLNEo tw3jynEr2cNJuQS/ERY4E4vebkP4rAZzWItsSGfOh2D7aldZDIDlQYtwbT1LLxbX RvMb4ZlCg2kUUK1QAMcAe2SrkYWnJdLCTvg== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (003.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id pVD0tEE4FQjZ; Mon, 2 Jun 2025 18:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [73.103.120.3] (c-73-103-120-3.hsd1.in.comcast.net [73.103.120.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jcflack@acm.org) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4bB2ml6q7QzlgqVM; Mon, 2 Jun 2025 18:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: tighten generic_option_name, or store more carefully in catalog? To: Tom Lane References: <6830EB30.8090904@acm.org> <3020890.1748735715@sss.pgh.pa.us> <683BA390.7000903@acm.org> <3029560.1748740373@sss.pgh.pa.us> <683BBE52.8050900@acm.org> <557970.1748888023@sss.pgh.pa.us> Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers From: Chapman Flack Message-ID: <683DF0E5.1040905@acm.org> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 14:43:49 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <557970.1748888023@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 06/02/25 14:13, Tom Lane wrote: > Here's a proposed patch for the "=" issue. Whether or not we should > rethink FDW validation behavior, doing so surely couldn't be > back-patched. But I think this much should be. LGTM Regards, -Chap