Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lyxy9-0002kF-Ii for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 14:47:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lyxy8-0006AG-Ft for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 14:47:08 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lyxy8-0006A8-8B for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 14:47:08 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lyxy3-00047v-IY for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 14:47:07 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 161EksQv692805; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 10:46:54 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Noah Misch cc: Alvaro Herrera , Michael Paquier , Jacob Champion , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" , Daniel Gustafsson , info@cspug.cz Subject: Re: Preventing abort() and exit() calls in libpq In-reply-to: <20210701052352.GD2288851@rfd.leadboat.com> References: <202107010144.ffjf7l4izv4m@alvherre.pgsql> <648217.1625111110@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20210701045309.GB2288851@rfd.leadboat.com> <653608.1625116848@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20210701052352.GD2288851@rfd.leadboat.com> Comments: In-reply-to Noah Misch message dated "Wed, 30 Jun 2021 22:23:52 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <692803.1625150814.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 10:46:54 -0400 Message-ID: <692804.1625150814@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Noah Misch writes: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 01:20:48AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I've just re-read the POSIX spec for "nm", and I do not see anything there >> that would support that interpretation. > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/nm.html says: > nm [-APv] [-g|-u] [-t format] file... Oh, right, I failed to look carefully at the syntax diagram. Local testing also supports the conclusion that -g isn't needed here, so pushed that way. Thanks for investigating that! regards, tom lane