Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gse7Q-0002tU-Cw for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 01:41:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gse7O-00015Z-Oe for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 01:41:14 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gse7O-00015S-Du for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 01:41:14 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gse7M-0005Uy-2v for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 01:41:13 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1A1f6PD006933; Sat, 9 Feb 2019 20:41:06 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Amit Langote , Peter Geoghegan , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages) In-reply-to: <20190210012659.GA31140@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20190210012659.GA31140@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Sat, 09 Feb 2019 22:26:59 -0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6931.1549762866.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 20:41:06 -0500 Message-ID: <6932.1549762866@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > On 2019-Feb-09, Tom Lane wrote: >> Uh-huh. And what happens after DETACH PARTITION ... are you going to run >> around and recreate these triggers? > Yep, that's there too. OK, then I guess it's fine. regards, tom lane