Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sAabt-00Axrd-R0 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 24 May 2024 19:29:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sAabs-008bbU-QQ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 24 May 2024 19:29:48 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sAabs-008bbM-Gn for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 24 May 2024 19:29:48 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sAabp-001p89-VF for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 24 May 2024 19:29:47 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 44OJTdGD695265; Fri, 24 May 2024 15:29:39 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alexander Korotkov cc: Pavel Borisov , Justin Pryzby , Dmitry Koval , Alexander Lakhin , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Tomas Vondra , Alvaro Herrera Subject: Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands In-reply-to: References: <0f655bcd-6487-4179-f9cf-c248efbad510@gmail.com> <41117807-3bea-45bc-a9c0-743c29abff2d@postgrespro.ru> Comments: In-reply-to Alexander Korotkov message dated "Fri, 17 May 2024 14:33:40 +0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <695263.1716578979.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 15:29:39 -0400 Message-ID: <695264.1716578979@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk The partition_split test has unstable results, as shown at [1]. I suggest adding "ORDER BY conname" to the two queries shown to fail there. Better look at other queries in the test for possible similar problems, too. regards, tom lane [1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=3Djackdaw&dt=3D= 2024-05-24%2015%3A58%3A17