From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com>
cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
        Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pg_settings.pending_restart not set when line removed
In-reply-to: 
 <CAFh8B=k==4VjEDHv0RFCL40+CN5rC686yTM2eOboEyAWK9hM9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <273674.1627398036@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <202107272017.rueagj54fhmt@alvherre.pgsql>
 <CAFh8B=k==4VjEDHv0RFCL40+CN5rC686yTM2eOboEyAWK9hM9A@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com>
	message dated "Fri, 13 Aug 2021 16:30:39 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <69592.1628865938.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 10:45:38 -0400
Message-ID: <69593.1628865938@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/69593.1628865938%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com> writes:
> IMO is totally wrong, because the actual value didn't change: it was an
> empty string in the config and now it remains an empty string due to the
> default value in the guc.c

I can't get very excited about that.  The existing message about
"parameter \"%s\" cannot be changed without restarting the server"
was emitted without regard to that fine point, and nobody has
complained about it.

			regards, tom lane