Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e07aL-0007NC-TG for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:57:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e07aL-0005Xd-G6 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:57:13 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e07aK-0005Vm-Pz for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:57:12 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e07aH-0002ht-LK for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 14:57:12 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v95Ev0pV007032; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:57:00 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Robert Haas cc: Etsuro Fujita , Jeff Janes , David Steele , Ashutosh Bapat , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 In-reply-to: References: <0700eb97-d9db-33da-4ba2-e28d2a1631d9@lab.ntt.co.jp> <47f35675-e504-033a-5bbe-185b78b47c3b@pgmasters.net> <23a0e23e-853f-5937-a5fd-84e6c869be92@lab.ntt.co.jp> <79b98e30-4d38-7deb-f1fb-bc0bc589a958@lab.ntt.co.jp> <6a546fa4-6e86-a5ef-8264-cb44d21ff8b6@lab.ntt.co.jp> <97fd423c-b9b2-4e14-71b3-f48693bb5c04@lab.ntt.co.jp> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas message dated "Thu, 05 Oct 2017 10:15:24 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7030.1507215420.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 10:57:00 -0400 Message-ID: <7031.1507215420@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Robert Haas writes: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> We'd definitely need to do things that way in 9.6. I'm not quite sure >> whether it's too late to adopt the clean solution in v10. > It probably is now. Are you still planning to do something about this pa= tch? It's still on my list, but I didn't get to it during the CF. regards, tom lane --=20 Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers