Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWrR7-0000NU-P6 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 21:18:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWrR6-0004xw-TX for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 21:18:28 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWrPg-0002ll-BL for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 21:17:00 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWrPd-0001Pq-4B for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 21:16:59 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v0QLGoVW007041; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:16:50 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Andrew Dunstan , Pavan Deolasee , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: Failure in commit_ts tap tests In-reply-to: <20170126205052.2z6qoxa7q4xwrnfo@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20170126205052.2z6qoxa7q4xwrnfo@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:50:52 -0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7039.1485465410.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:16:50 -0500 Message-ID: <7040.1485465410@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Alvaro Herrera writes: > It is really quite annoying that the buildfarm doesn't do what stock > tests do. What about pushing a bit stronger for having these > optimizations as part of the standard build run, instead of being only > in the buildfarm client script? Huh? It's just a question of "make check" vs "make installcheck". They each have their uses. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers